Actually 15% of 40% is 6% not 46% :-) An additional 15% of 40% added to 40% would be 46%. But the statement was that exclusive images make 10% over non exclusive images. So if exclusive images make 40%, 10% over that would be 50% and not taking 10 [En savoir plus...] envoyé Royalties, subscriptions and SR-EL update

Actually 15% of 40% is 6% not 46% :-) An additional 15% of 40% added to 40% would be 46%. But the statement was that exclusive images make 10% over non exclusive images. So if exclusive images make 40%, 10% over that would be 50% and not taking 10% of the original 40% and adding that to it to make 44%. Think of it this way Non exclusive images make 40% of 100% Exclusive images make a % of the 100% too if they are to be considered equal. So if the exclusive images make 46% of 100% they make 6% more than the non exclusive images. To say that 6% is 15% more than the non exclusive ones is a bit inflated since they didn't start at the same 100% to come to that number. I know it's all semantics I was just saying that the original statement was confusing to anyone that understands math. Not that pointing this out will change anything I just wanted to say that the math wasn't really correct in that statement. That would be like telling someone that they get a 20% discount on a $10.00 item but taking the 20% from $8.00 because that's the final number therefore the discount would only be $1.60 and not $2.00. posted in Royalties, subscriptions and SR-EL update